PANEL: THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT: CAN IT BE FIXED? SHOULD IT EXIST?
The past year and a half has seen state parties leave the International Criminal Court because
of allegations that the ICC is political and partial. Non-state parties have loudly protested moves
by the Office of the Prosecutor to involve the court in the national affairs of nations which did not
consent to its jurisdiction. Despite hundreds of millions of dollars spent over more than 15 years,
the ICC has successfully convicted only 3 individuals. What, if anything, can be done to make the
ICC fairer and more effective? Is a non-political international court even possible?
MODERATOR: Lieutenant Colonel (Res.) Sarit Shemer, COO, Shurat HaDin and Retired Military
Advocate General’s Corps Officer
• Professor Avi Bell, Professor of Law, University of San Diego and Bar Ilan University Faculty of Law
• Professor Githu Muigai, Former Attorney General of the Republic of Kenya
• Nick Kaufman, Former Prosecuting Attorney, International Criminal Court
• Professor Rachel Vanlandingham, Former Judge Advocate, U.S. Air Force, Professor at
Southwestern Law School